核心矩阵协议 · 迁移到新被试

语义目标 ERP(TMNRED / ds005383)

下面这些分数是怎么来的——队列、数据划分、电极、时间窗、每种方法允许学什么、随机猜测能得多少分——都按已发布的协议文件给出。只在本协议内部比较分数。

协议步骤、局限说明、方法备注与数据集署名来自发布数据本身,保持英文原文——它们随数据一起被审核,翻译会让网页与可下载文件不再一致。

协议概览

任务
Reading · target versus nontarget events
评测方式
迁移到新被试
数据集
TMNRED / ds005383
被试
30
数据量
3,600 epochs · 5 participant-disjoint folds
输入
30 channels · 1-second windows
随机水平
50.0%
指标
平衡准确率(主指标)· 宏平均 F1(次指标)

结果

在本协议下运行过的每一种方法,以及已发布结果文件中记录的分数。只在这张表内纵向比较:其他协议在队列、电极、时间窗或随机水平上有所不同。

Spectral ridge
51.0% (49.6%–52.5%)
Temporal ridge
56.3% (54.4%–58.4%)
LaBraM
53.2% (51.3%–54.9%)
CBraMod
55.8% (54.2%–57.4%)
EEGNet
61.4% (58.9%–64.0%)
平衡准确率,本协议下的每一种方法。 点为估计值,横线为描述性 95% 区间,虚线为随机水平。
方法训练方式平衡准确率宏平均 F1通道被试评分耗时
Spectral ridge经典方法Supervised fit51.0%49.6%–52.5%区间触及随机水平0.506Mean across held-out participants30300.9 s
Temporal ridge经典方法Supervised fit56.3%54.4%–58.4%0.559Mean across held-out participants30301.2 s
LaBraM基础模型Frozen encoder + ridge head53.2%51.3%–54.9%0.519Mean across held-out participants30303.4 s
CBraMod基础模型Frozen encoder + ridge head55.8%54.2%–57.4%0.554Mean across held-out participants303023.5 s
EEGNet轻量模型Scratch · 20 epochs61.4%58.9%–64.0%0.606Mean across held-out participants303083.4 s

评分耗时包括拟合与预测,可能含加速器等待时间,不含数据准备。它只对该配置有效,不是硬件基准。

未在本协议下运行: CSP+LDA, ShallowFBCSPNet, Deep4Net, Standard CCA。这里缺少的方法只是没有在本协议上运行——不是失败。

谨慎解读

Balanced event subset with collapsed semantic categories. Natural class prevalence is not preserved. Third-party reading passages and participant metadata are excluded from this website.

协议步骤

  1. 5 participant-disjoint folds. All recordings from a person stay together. Each person contributes to the held-out predictions once.
  2. units: microvolts; epoch: [event onset, onset + 1.0 s); filtering: none added
  3. One fixed seed (20260919); no early stopping or test-based tuning. EEGNet trains for 20 epochs per fold. Frozen encoders use training-only standardized ridge heads (alpha 100).
  4. Labels: nontarget, target.
  5. Uniform-guessing reference: 50.00%. Scores weight participants equally. Intervals describe participant variation; cross-validation training sets overlap.
  6. Research subset with fixed deterministic sampling capped at 60 epochs per participant/class.
  7. Balancing to 60 per class changes the source target/nontarget prevalence.
  8. Events use numbered target/nontarget variants; the benchmark collapses the suffix only because the trial_type prefix explicitly names the semantic class.

稳定性

One fixed seed and training budget; multi-seed sensitivity pending.

是否出现在预训练数据中

Unknown unless explicitly documented; no unseen-pretraining claim.

方法说明

模型条款

来源与许可

TMNRED / ds005383

署名 Yanru Bai, Qi Tang et al. · TMNRED, A Chinese Language EEG Dataset for Fuzzy Semantic Target Identification in Natural Reading Environments (2025), doi:10.1038/s41597-025-05036-2. OpenNeuro ds005383 v1.0.0.

许可 OpenNeuro 元数据为 CC0;配套论文与 GitHub 为 CC BY 4.0 ↗OpenNeuro metadata says CC0; accompanying publication/GitHub says CC BY 4.0

数据集记录 ↗ · 这个数据集上的全部结果 →

BCI Report 不转发任何记录。这些是 BCI Report 在上述许可下计算的聚合测量;数据归属于署名中的作者。

许可范围 Personal noncommercial research; aggregate results only

隐私 这里只发布队列级聚合结果:不发布任何记录、被试编号或逐人分数。 完整的审查说明在协议 JSON 中 ↓

公开数据登记说明 有充分的、该研究专属的公开共享证据。聚合指标不会再分发刺激文本与被试元数据;按 CC BY 署名。Strong study-specific open-sharing evidence. Aggregate metrics avoid redistribution of stimulus text and participant metadata; credit under CC BY.

权利审查于 · 依据 doi.org ↗ · www.nature.com ↗

复现记录

协议 ID
parallel-fixed-subject-folds-v1/ds005383
数据集版本
OpenNeuro snapshot 1.0.0 · ad78f3db430e636595b1b1c08417492f3067a25e
硬件
Local Ubuntu / CUDA
评分阶段总耗时
112.4 s · 可能含加速器等待
审计记录 SHA-256
5920974ae9ca3876ce1be82497c139f0783d2ff47173641e329af976441de4c4
汇总 SHA-256
c5dca7fc30d07a001b8980a4ea65e55ef292f0891a4d32a12262b8ec88389243
协议 SHA-256
839dfba89cf200aac7a28a7259f45024d006fcd4500170e247fcc1c4e9962c8d

下载

其他协议

全部协议 → · 首页上的核心矩阵 → · 全部数据集 → · 全部方法 →