核心矩阵协议 · 迁移到新被试

P300 目标 ERP(ds006593)

下面这些分数是怎么来的——队列、数据划分、电极、时间窗、每种方法允许学什么、随机猜测能得多少分——都按已发布的协议文件给出。只在本协议内部比较分数。

协议步骤、局限说明、方法备注与数据集署名来自发布数据本身,保持英文原文——它们随数据一起被审核,翻译会让网页与可下载文件不再一致。

协议概览

任务
Visual target versus nontarget events
评测方式
迁移到新被试
数据集
ds006593
被试
21
数据量
2,520 epochs · 5 participant-disjoint folds
输入
19 channels · 1-second windows
随机水平
50.0%
指标
平衡准确率(主指标)· 宏平均 F1(次指标)

结果

在本协议下运行过的每一种方法,以及已发布结果文件中记录的分数。只在这张表内纵向比较:其他协议在队列、电极、时间窗或随机水平上有所不同。

Spectral ridge
51.0% (49.6%–52.4%)
Temporal ridge
53.8% (51.9%–55.6%)
LaBraM
49.4% (47.7%–51.2%)
CBraMod
55.0% (53.3%–56.7%)
EEGNet
53.3% (51.7%–54.9%)
平衡准确率,本协议下的每一种方法。 点为估计值,横线为描述性 95% 区间,虚线为随机水平。
方法训练方式平衡准确率宏平均 F1通道被试评分耗时
Spectral ridge经典方法Supervised fit51.0%49.6%–52.4%区间触及随机水平0.505Mean across held-out participants19210.4 s
Temporal ridge经典方法Supervised fit53.8%51.9%–55.6%0.520Mean across held-out participants19210.5 s
LaBraM基础模型Frozen encoder + ridge head49.4%47.7%–51.2%不高于随机水平0.486Mean across held-out participants192110.6 s
CBraMod基础模型Frozen encoder + ridge head55.0%53.3%–56.7%0.529Mean across held-out participants19214.8 s
EEGNet轻量模型Scratch · 20 epochs53.3%51.7%–54.9%0.500Mean across held-out participants192145.6 s

评分耗时包括拟合与预测,可能含加速器等待时间,不含数据准备。它只对该配置有效,不是硬件基准。

未在本协议下运行: CSP+LDA, ShallowFBCSPNet, Deep4Net, Standard CCA。这里缺少的方法只是没有在本协议上运行——不是失败。

谨慎解读

Balanced target/nontarget sample changes the source 1:9 prevalence. One-second windows include later flashes at 0.3-second intervals; this is not an online speller estimate.

协议步骤

  1. 5 participant-disjoint folds. All recordings from a person stay together. Each person contributes to the held-out predictions once.
  2. units: microvolts; epoch: [stimulus onset, onset + 1.0 s); filtering: none added
  3. One fixed seed (20260919); no early stopping or test-based tuning. EEGNet trains for 20 epochs per fold. Frozen encoders use training-only standardized ridge heads (alpha 100).
  4. Labels: nontarget, target.
  5. Uniform-guessing reference: 50.00%. Scores weight participants equally. Intervals describe participant variation; cross-validation training sets overlap.
  6. Research subset with fixed deterministic sampling capped at 60 epochs per participant/class.
  7. The cap balances target and nontarget and therefore changes the original approximately 1:9 class prevalence.
  8. Stimuli were presented about every 0.3 s, so each 1 s epoch contains responses to later stimuli; this is intrinsic next-stimulus contamination.

稳定性

One fixed seed and training budget; multi-seed sensitivity pending.

是否出现在预训练数据中

Unknown unless explicitly documented; no unseen-pretraining claim.

方法说明

模型条款

来源与许可

ds006593

署名 OpenNeuro ds006593 contributors · version 1.0.0, doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds006593.v1.0.0; original author credits retained at the linked source.

许可 CC0-1.0 ↗

数据集记录 ↗ · 这个数据集上的全部结果 →

BCI Report 不转发任何记录。这些是 BCI Report 在上述许可下计算的聚合测量;数据归属于署名中的作者。

许可范围 Personal noncommercial research; aggregate results only

隐私 这里只发布队列级聚合结果:不发布任何记录、被试编号或逐人分数。 完整的审查说明在协议 JSON 中 ↓

公开数据登记说明 锁定的 CC0 版本,有该数据集专属的 IRB 批准与同意书证据,元数据暴露相对较少。Pinned CC0 release with dataset-specific IRB and consent evidence and comparatively low metadata exposure.

权利审查于 · 依据 doi.org ↗ · nemar.org ↗

复现记录

协议 ID
parallel-fixed-subject-folds-v1/ds006593
数据集版本
OpenNeuro snapshot 1.0.0 · b3fa345b310abfcf442dd4e2867f6652336c3fe4
硬件
Local Ubuntu / CUDA
评分阶段总耗时
61.9 s · 可能含加速器等待
审计记录 SHA-256
30762120c57bede9f47d2e96637656e8948fca458016f7f2e3a39f951a357716
汇总 SHA-256
a63a7ba5bbd6dd7865ae260b707c2db896136646a910d96516fa5c862e1146c0
协议 SHA-256
bf6796dfe04dffa57bdd08933d2bb743722da71594135f04fa4fc33f3fb7dd46

下载

其他协议

全部协议 → · 首页上的核心矩阵 → · 全部数据集 → · 全部方法 →